AMAZON TRAVEL CARBON EMISSION OFFSET [WHY NOT NEEDED]

CO₂ Emission compensation for National Park visits

A carbon offset credit is a service that tries to reduce the net carbon emissions of people or organizations by compensating their carbon emissions with measures for absorbing greenhouse gases. A wide variety of offset actions are available; forest planting is the most common, as the new trees very gradually absorb CO₂ from the air and convert it to carbon in their trunks. 

But worldwide, far more CO₂ gets blasted into the atmosphere from virgin forests being cut down. One of the most effective ways of preventing forests from being cut down is protecting them as national parks and nature reserves. But in order to do so, these forests must produce at least some income.

Assume a tropical forest has about 175 metric tons of Carbon in its trees. The carbon is fixed in the tree trunks, leaves and roots. So, if a hectare of forest gets deforested, the wood may first be used to build houses, furniture or produce paper, but eventually, it will either rot away or be burned and eventually all the carbon of that forest will be converted into CO₂. The mass of CO₂ is more than 3 times more than that of Carbon, so the 175 tons of carbon will produce more that 500 tons of CO₂.

Now, we only believe in durable avoidance of the emission of CO₂, if the emission avoidance of carbon dioxide is really permanent. So in our opinion, you can only permanently avoid the emission of CO₂ into the air, if you set up an endowment fund that would generate the capital interest from which management costs can be financed permanently. Assuming a 7% return from the endowment fund, it would take about $2,700,000 to prevent 500,000 tons of CO₂ to be released into the air, which is about $5 per ton. That is about as much as for the short-term fixation of Carbon through forest plantations, whereas Carbon dioxide emission avoidance through and Adopt-A-Ranger-Endowment fund would be permanent! 

If you come from the USA, your contribution to the CO₂ emission from your flight will probably have been about 8000 kg CO₂ per person; coming from Europe it will have been around 13,000 kg CO₂; averaging somewhere around 10,000kg. The total release of CO₂ from the jungle of Cuyabeno would be about 500 * 6,000,000 (ha) = 3,000,000,000 kg CO₂. Given the fact that ecotourism has rescued Cuyabeno by going there and spending their tourism dollars/euros to see the reserve. As the average amount of CO₂ production from flights to Ecuador has been about 10,000 kg, one may argue that the first 300,000 visitors to Cuyabeno may consider their flight fully compensated by visiting Cuyabeno. Under the current level of visitation that will allow for somewhere between 15 - 20 more years of CO₂-offset for AMAZON TRAVEL and other forested national parks protected by Ecuador's Environment Ministry. This does not apply as much for Savannahs - which only have 5 - 15% forest cover - and other protected areas with limited forest cover such as Galapagos National Park. RAINFOREST TRIP CARBON EMISSION OFFSET FOR FLYING Read how to offset carbon emission for flying to protect the Amazon rainforest.

You think this is not enough?

One of our shareholders is an expert on Forest CO₂ emissions contracted by international organizations like the World Bank and the United Nations and he has written this page because this is his professional opinion. Read here how you can help protect the Amazon with Rainforest CO2 Emission offset without buying credits. But of course you are always free to buy additional Carbon credits, in which case we recommend: http://www.adopt-a-ranger.org.